It is stated in the books that Aragorn is not a simple human. Uruk-Hai are nothing special, their fighting technique consists of being strong and hacking at things with a sword. Nothing about him is every clarified, it's all vague. That was against a woman. Book Jaime is no joke, Aragorn would be toast because lets face it, what did Aragorn really do? That's called being logical. If he had access to a Valerian steel sword, possibly you would have a point. At one point he is in a very weakened state with his hands bound and he fights another expert swordsman, later the person he was fighting admits they could barely hold there own against him. Aragorn wins no less than a solid majority, but it's not easy, as they are both exceedingly talented. He isn't even the best swordsman in the books. His incredible skill with a sword is quite instrumental to his character. By rejecting non-essential cookies, Reddit may still use certain cookies to ensure the proper functionality of our platform. If you want, I'll PM you the rants in question. He engages in battle with the Ma Qui putain de gagne ? Jaime Lannister is, admittedly, a gifted and immensely talented swordsman. That gives no spoilers away; it is simple truth. Jaime's skill paired with his armor means he could stand his ground for a long while and take a good amount of hits before going down. With such a disadvantage he was still more than a match for an excellent swordsman, imagine if he'd been in a heathly state at the time. well, we can at least discuss it. You're nitpicking for the sake of nitpicking. With the loss of his great skill, he must redefine himself completely. Of course, Jaime's biggest weakness compared to Aragorn is that he's just an average human being. Aragorn wins against Jaime Lannister through sheer experience (90 years in training, combat and traveling), and has superhuman capabilities (based on movie and some from books too). If he wasn't so incredibly skilled to begin with, his journey after losing the hand wouldn't carry nearly as much weight as it does. Well movie/show fighting tends to be godawful, but Aragorn did impressively deflect a dagger heading straight for his face like a jedi (which ironically was entirely real, accidental, and not choreographed but depended on Vigo's reflexes saving him from Lurtz's actor's bad throw). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwRix1p9sDY. [SPOILERS book J] COTF have to bring a ring to the Doom of Valyria. it is purposedly done by Martin to make the loss of his sword hand in a later book such a crisis of character for the Kingslayer. Let's just say that he's renowned as the best swordsman there is. with the help of that 3rd level illusionist, Aragorn was able to lure a whole kingdom to believe such a silly thing like that he was the heir of a thousands years lost dinasty. top fighters of their respective franchises. Again you gloss over my point that the very presence of plate indicates a greater knowledge of metallurgy. Although Aragorn is much older, that doesn't mean Jaime is low on experience. You have nothing to back your claim that kingslayer has an equipment advantage. The fact that Aragorn faced multitudes of those foes is exactly what is impressive (for the same reason that Garlan Tyrell's training is so impressive). It was the fire that made them flee, not any skill on Aragorns part. EDIT: Jaime gets both hands. yine de aragorn ile kyaslanamaz. Subscribe to the CBR newsletter for exclusive comics, TV & movie news, reviews, interviews & much more! Ben has taken a 'Film Production & Cinematography' university course, and recently completed a 'Scriptwriting' masters course, both completed at Bournemouth University. But Jaime Lannister is one of the best ever. That's interesting. These are also a worlds based in magic and mythical creatures (which our world's medieval setting did not have from the history I've read). CONNEXION. You're right that much of the debate surrounding Aragorn rests on assumptions and theories. It's hard to calculate his swordsmanship. For those who don't know in the LOTR books leaders like Aragorn have the power to inspire others, push back dark will, and fight better, in Aragorn's case this comes from his kingly blood. And Aragorn facing five Ringwraiths atop Weather top is also impressive, considering that they are most powerful servants of Sauron. It's good to wear armor if you're fighting with sharp pieces of metal.". Throughout his life, he hunted and attacked allies of Sauron and even led a siege on the city of Umbar, which stood with the forces of Mordor. No, there isn't. He didn't really fight the Nazguls, he just surprised them and drove them off with fire. But yes, they do address that particular feat. Aragorn's speed and skill would indeed be the key to him taking Jaime down, and his far superior battle experience would make it very hard for Jaime to gain an upper hand. it is purposedly done by Martin to make the loss of his sword hand in a later book such a crisis of character for the Kingslayer. Supposedly Book Aragorn doesn't have superhuman physical attributes and if Jaime's wearing plate, that's another point in his favor. cesaretli de birisi. This is my opinion of how it plays out: Aragorn II Elessar at 87 is crowned King of Arnor and Gondor, he decides to conquer the Seven Kingdoms and bring order, he bids his wife goodbye and goes. That good enough for you? Anybody saying Jaime can win this should ask themselves whether Jaime could equal any of these feats. Aragorn often fought against superior numbers, big deal. Jaime doesn't have enough feats to put him at Aragorn's levels. "Significantly above peak human level" Really, when did they discuss this in the books? - Battle to KO, surrender or Death. Jaime is a foe who has extensively studied the blade and is said by many characters to be extremely skilled. It affects the character on a profound level. One thing to consider is that Lord of the Rings is based on and has the tech level equivalent of early middle ages, while A Song of Ice and Fire is based on and has the tech level equivalent of late middle ages. If you bothered to read the OP you would realize that stealth is not a factor in this fight. Aug 12, 2016 #25 His entire life was full of conflict and victories, and so he undoubtedly has the skill to stand againstJaime Lannister. Why do you keep bringing up tracking, knowledge about herbs and other crap that doesn't apply to this fight. Aragorn vs. Jaime Lannister: Who Is the Greater Fantasy Swordsman? I really only see Jaime having a chance in Round 3. Add to that his numerous tourney victories, and the tales of his exploits in previous campaigns, it illustrates quite clearly that Jaime is one of, if not the best swordsman in the GoT's world. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. - page 2 - Topic Aragorn vs Jaime Lannister du 31-05-2022 18:21:15 sur les forums de jeuxvideo.com. JavaScript is disabled. @Strider92: "Wasn't Aragorn the descendant of Elros Tar-Minyatur (Elrond's twin brother) in the book?". He beat the freaken mouth of Sauron in a staring contest. I did not want to spoil anything for those who have not read the series, but I haven't even gone into the instances in SOFAI where, in individual duel combat (which is what we have here), the fighter in the heavier plate armor has been at a distinct disadvantage. Sujet : Aragorn vs Jaime Lannister. No, we don't need to guess because we know that it gives him greatly increase stamina - he run for three days without rest, withouth food and water and he wasn't even tired after that. He's like 80+ or something by the time of Fellowship. Let's just say that he's renowned as the best swordsman there is. Not that impressive. That being said, I'd still give Elessar a solid chance in Round 3 with a comfortable majority in each of the first two Rounds. What do they have that surpasses mithril armor, which Aragorn would probably be sporting? You don't happen to have a link? I would agree, but recently I read an extensive post on Reddit. He can fight all of the Nazgul at the same time and kill dozens of Uruk-hai, all of them bigger and stronger than any soldier Jaime ever killed. You should've added a "(lol)" to other scenarios as well, Aragorn slices him in half in every single one of them. Thankfully for him, everyone else is just as shit in the movie. The only thing we really have to get a sense of Aragorns skill is the foes he's faced, everything else is irrelavent. What we do know of Aragorn is this -- he has battled orcs and goblins, Urak-hai and Ringwraiths, and has fought and led Men into numerous battles, both large and small, including the Battle of the Hornburg and the Battle of the Pelennor Fields. Therefore you are guessing that one armor is better because of how they resemble what our medieval equipment was like. For The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt on the PlayStation 4, a GameFAQs message board topic titled "Aragorn and Jaime Lannister vs Geralt" - Page 6. dedekorkut46. Ser Selmy at one point talks of Jaime being the best natural swordsman that he's ever seen. Aragorn=King. Being a Dunedain, Ranger doesn't really equate to superman levels of anything - I've read the all, the books and the Silmarillion and the only apparent difference between boromir, and aragorn (for instance) is that aragorn has an extended lifespan; His experience, is crucial here though. Thus he must have had the physical stats to keep up with an Elf who I believe were confirmed to be reasonably faster then humans. Being able to take on savage Urak-hai, orcs, & etc isn't even close to the same thing as being able to take on the Kingslayer. Posts outside the content scope are removed. All Aragorn did was hack up a bunch of no skill grunts. 1 2 3. I don't recall any fight with Ringwraiths other than the one on Weathertop, and that was hardly a real fight. Still can't get over the fact that this is the same For everyone who is currently rewatching GoT. If he wasn't so incredibly skilled to begin with, his journey after losing the hand wouldn't carry nearly as much weight as it does. He undoubtedly has excellent precisionand control when weaving through a hoard but facing down an expert fighter with no distractions is a much different circumstance than he seems used to. You're nitpicking because you're trying to make the works something they're not. With the loss of his great skill, he must redefine himself completely. Aragorn vs Jaime Lannister. Aragorn. He have blood of Nmenor in him, so he is above what would we call peak human - he aged vastly slower than normal man ( when he fought in the War for the ring he was 88 years old, he have incredible endurance and stamina: once he run for three days and nights without sleep, food and water, and yet he wasn't tired. So, what we see is that a maimed Jaime is able to hold his own against a skilled -- but not great -- knight. Based on feats and instances where skill is discussed Jaime is the clear victor. To me, Aragorn is just sheer force of will; you're not breaking him, and i'm not sure it's relevant that he's Nmenoreon other than it's made it possible for him to accumulate so much experience. We never hear any feats of exactly what a Ranger is capable of, so it's all just guess work. [Spoiler Alert] Aragorn wins when they fight in Book J. I have a funny quote (my own idea) While Jaime and Aragorn is busy fighting each other in the random location- until Jaime suddenly stops. White walkers are no simple human either, still one was killed by a Sam. RELATED: Lord of the Rings vs. Game of Thrones: Could Daenerys' Army Defeat Sauron's? Tranquil Fury The Only Thing I know May 18, 2014 #16 Bender said: Also Aragorn is slightly Numenorean IIRC For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. oooooo.I think I'm going to go with Aragorn. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. As of the newest book, Sir Barristan Selmy states that someone is the best natural swordsman he has seen since Jaime Lannister, which strongly implies that the famous and very skilled Selmy who claimed he could kill all the other Kingsguard (Jaime was absent) with ease rates Jaime as the best sword in Westeros at the time of the books. Man, I really need to start reading Game of Thrones and re-read LOTR. Round 1: film Aragorn vs. film Jaime Round 2: film Aragorn vs. book Jaime Round 3: book Aragorn vs. book Jaime (lol) No Narsil. While wearing no armor can make you more dexterous, it's a good point that Aragorn is at a disadvantage for never wearing any. Big deal, is there anything to suggest a normal blade couldn't have done that? My vote goes to him simply because his physical stats are higher (due to him running for 3 days straight) and he used to train with Legolas. It's likely that it was just a normal sword, and the only time Elfs dealt with it was when they reforged it. Not to mention a lot of orcs, and he has way more experience than jamie will ever have (literally, and add in that jamie is in game of thrones, he's gonna die).. And Aragorn has an elf princess as wife, beat that :D. @princearagorn1: Not to mention the fact that Aragorn went through the whole three books/films without getting wounded. Gandalf mentions something about him being able to lead men well but not with any help from some inner magic. Jaime lannister. Lannister is good but with that many years of experience I don't see him beating Aragorn. People are going to naturally say Aragorn, even though he has virtually no feats, and his skill with a blade is never discussed. I'm not going to argue this, because -- as I said -- I don't even necessarily agree with it myself. Elros and Elrond were given a choice of which race they would live with (adopting the resulting life span and traits, etc). He sends his son Kingslayer aka Jamie Lannister to go in at night and kill Aragorn in his sleep. ;) Aragorn can hide himself from his oponent and attack at the right moment. View complete answer on reddit.com He has traveled the world learning new things as well. No one is saying BookAragorn is an average fighter; he's pretty much exceptional, even more with Andril. Take his 'magic sword' for instance. Is that some nickname for the King of Gondor? Whilethis gives Aragornthe upper hand, his natural-born advantage doesn't necessarily equate to skill. You must log in or register to reply here. New Movie News, Movie Trailers & upcoming Movie Reviews, Evil Dead Rise Could Change the Franchise's Rules Forever. He's 80 something years old and still in his prime, was trained by the elves, owns a mythical uber sword, and has done nothing but fight and survive his entire life. It's irrelevant. Aragorn has Numenor blood, which gives him incredible power. We have three main rules. But, it would seem that his accomplishments -- not Aragorn's -- are the ones that are lacking. Jaime nearly overwhelms an expert swordsman while under severe handicap. Because, I have yet to see him face the caliber of adversary, or fight in battles of the same magnitude, as Aragorn. Meaning that Aragorn will likely be armored in chain mail, while Jaime will be rocking a full or partial plate, giving him a good advantage. This, this and this. Also, because you know, were are they fighting, starting distance ect.
Resnet101 Number Of Parameters, Speech To Text Sample Audio, Honda Gx690 Recommended Oil, High Performance Javascript Charts, Force Of A Tsunami In Newtons, Does Serum Come With Fl Studio, Application Of Molecular Biology, Pitsco Drone Curriculum, Dell Hardware Service Contract Renewal Cost, Honda Gx690 Parts Manual Pdf,