In this regard Kentmere 400 has always served me well, however, here, I think Fomapan performed just as well as the Kentmere. While FPP doesnt disclose who manufactures their films, its relatively clear from both published development times and overall performance that the film is actually Fomapan 100 in 16mm double-perf format. One of these photographs was made with Kentmere 400, and the other with Fomapan 400. 5 Reasons Why You Should Try Fomapan 200. The only readily available option is Film Photography Project (FPP) Cine 16 B&W Negative 100 film. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. Kentmere 400 or apx400 in Europe (they are the same) are a good film with medium contrast. Alternatively, pre-soak and rinse the film several times before pouring-in the developer. While Fomapan is still about the least expensive 120 film you can get, its price advantage over arguably better films has eroded since I initially wrote this review. As you might expect, Fomapan 100 Classic and 200 Creative have the best grain qualities; very fine and lots of detail. Theres never a bad time to go out and shoot some film. vielleicht findet man da noch einen brauchbaren Rhythmus, ich habs dann drangegeben, als der K400 leergebraucht war. So which is the better film? You know what they basically said? Just out of curiosity, which developer/dilution did you use to process the film? As I mentioned earlier, the film performs the best when over-exposed by a stop or a little less than a stop, but that shouldnt stop you from shooting it as the box speed of ASA-400. But for some, $20 is a big deal. Too many reviewers shoot their backyard trees. Kentmere seems to be accurately rated at 400, and Ive never been inclined to shoot it over/under, or even to push or pull it. Some great shots here, but the man smoking in the bus is just terrific. With all the bulk loaders I know of, the film comes out of the opening from the place you put the roll in and you then shut the gate that allows light in before you switch the light back on. [], [] of a film camera as well as film itself, and this meant that my results were not ideal. If I dial back the development time about 10 to 15 percent, the shadow detail is fine and the contrast and grain are brought under control. If you enjoyed my work here you can find more of it over on my Instagram. Foma 400 indeed has deep red sensitivity. I want to see what a film or lens does on the street or around people. However the overall effect is actually quite muddy, and unpleasing to my eye, whereas the Fomapan in the same condition is undeniably less detailed, but results in a nicer image (in my opinion).if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[336,280],'35mmc_com-box-4','ezslot_11',182,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-box-4-0'); Kentmere 400, exposed for the dappled light. Update: May 26, 2021Added a notation that the Fomapan data sheets indicate that the anti-halation dye clears during development, but that it has not been my experience that it does. An update here. I am interested in contrast in less than optimal conditions, and the detail were able to pull out of specifically the darker areas of the image. ALL my posts are to be read with an aMaZeBaLLs BARRY WHITE voice. Most of my serious stuff I would not use 35mm for. Review | Kentmere 400 vs. Tri-X vs. HP5 Plus. You are using an out of date browser. Well, you really shouldnt develop the film in D-76 and, yes, you need to shoot the film at half the box speed. allerdings wurden die Negative dann auch recht dicht- gerade so, wie ich sie fr meinen hybriden Prozess bentige. Your previous content has been restored. Well, it took a great deal of experimentation, a tonne of different chemistry it also helped that I shot the stuff for three months of last year on my final round at a 52-roll project. . Kentmere is a low contrast film which leaves you a lot of room to work in the shadows, and turns out great when developed in DD-X. To begin, Fomapan is available in three speeds, with the following names: Of the three, I originally found 400 Action to be the most useful largely due to the ISO 400 speed, and its ability to cover a wide range of shooting situations. Find out more about 35mmc here. Honestly, Im glad I gave Fomapan 400 a second look; its turned into a film Im now more likely to reach for outside of my usual two fast films, Ilford HP5+ and Kodak Tri-X. The Kentmere retains slightly better detail in the highlights when exposing for shadow, and I am more comfortable with four-five stops difference between the lightest and darkest parts of the frame. Youre working in the profession, and Im a happily retired photo educator. Although I wouldnt recommend Fomapan 400 for long exposure work, youre compensating once you get past a second of exposure. Thank you Marius! HP5 Plus was the most dense film out of the bunch, which made it somewhat more difficult to scan. Fomapan 400 is pretty grainy, high-contrast, and cheap. A lovely aesthetic, but definitely one to be controlled rather than allowed to get out of hand. I know its a bit of a cop out to end a comparison piece like this with the statement that Ill shoot both, but they really do serve different purposes in my workflow. But honestly, Fomapan 400 Action is nearly indistinguishable from the two slower speeds in terms of grain, contrast, and image quality. I dont think this had anything to do with overexposure since my F100 is usually pretty consistent in matrix metering mode. Consider supporting Studio C-41 You cannot paste images directly. Ive always liked the look Ive been getting, and can definitely see a uniqueness from HP5 and Tri-X. I'm open to any dispute. Press?? Content contributor - become a part of the worlds biggest film and alternative photography community blog. Additionally, while I have shot Fomapan in 135 (35mm) format, this review pertains solely to the 120 (medium format) version. Fomapan 400, exposed for the sky behind the drivers cab. I am presently shooting Fomapan 200 in my 45. AG develop using Fujifilm Negastar chemistry, and honestly I dont really ever see much difference between rolls Ive developed myself and those done by external labs but then Im not a chemical connoisseur in the way some others may be. Easy to introduce texture in those areas in a print just by flashing the paper beforehand, if that is something that perticularly worried anyone who doesnt want any areas of pure white on their image. The Pen EE has not arrived yet.. The question isn't "is HP5 $20 better than Foma", but rather "do I value my work to the tune of $20". Tags: Black and White NegativeFomaMedium FormatReview. But as is the case of any fickle film, you have to develop it right. Yes, in that case you would be cutting into the film speed a bit, but you could still get more of the look you like while shooting the film you prefer. I buy all of my film from Analogue Wonderland.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-medrectangle-4','ezslot_11',181,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-medrectangle-4-0'); For more articles on 35mmc about the subject matter discussed here, please click one of the following tag links: Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience. The FomaPan scratches real easily. Analog Workflow Forums (100% Analog/Traditional). But Fomapan 400 is a film that came with a bit of reputation before I even shot it and developed it myself. Fomapan 200, Im still trying to figure something out. For starters it is a 200 ISO film not a 400 film. If Fomapan is already underexposed to my eye at box speed then that takes away from my ability to comfortably shoot this film in every situation I would want to apply it to. Grundstzlich passt auch jetzt alles in den Schrank, doch ordentlich ist das nicht. The woman was climbing out for some fresh air, that shot was taken during the heatwave in August! Everything is personal preference, just (Never shot Ilford) I am definitely going to try Kentmere. However for a budget option I hope that this article helps people to decide on something to try themselves! I decided to give Fomapan 400 a try after discovering that it is exactly the same price as Kentmere 400. Id guess the image on the right is Fomapan and vice versa. In their world, it was imperative to get the shot (a few were still using 45 press cameras) so each step of the process carried equal weight: exposure, developing, printing. I bought Arista edu 400 for it's infrared capability. Die vorgesehenen Entwickler sind Silvermax und Rodinal, fr 400 er hauptschlich Rodinal. Update: November 11, 2022Updated pricing references and made a few minor edits, including more detail around Fomapan in 135 format. Theres always something interesting here. All our Contributors have an ad-free experience for life.Sign uphere. There really isn't any more of a risk with the more expensive film. The contrast, larger grain, and character is the best Ive found at this price point. At $8.12 a roll for 36 exposures, you arent saving much by choosing this film over Kodaks offering. Seems like the Kentmere offers better tonality, though you call it muddy maybe print on a higher grade paper/up the contrast to get the harder look from fomapan? (Free 3-day trial)Subscribe here. Copyright 2020 Beyond the Aperture / MWI, All Rights Reserved, How to Identify and Use Rolleinar Lens Attachment Sets, Color Filters in Black and White Photography: An Introduction and Examples, Inspiration Found: What to Shoot When Youre Out of Ideas, Diagnosing Light Edges on Images (Dark Edges on Negatives). Compare Kodak T-Max 400 vs Foma Fomapan 400 Action vs Kodak Tri-X 400 vs Ilford HP5 Plus. Ive shot numerous rolls of this film to test repairs Ive made to my cameras, but not very many on what Id consider serious work. I loaded up my LowePro 400 AW II with my Nikon F100, 12-24mm f/2.8, 50mm f/1.8, and 85mm f/1.8 one foggy March morning before striking out through the streets of NYC to shoot some film. Well because as Neil deGrasse Tyson says, Exploration is what you do when you dont know what you are doing. ", the paintings, the drawings, the photographs. And many of us are looking for ways to shave a few bucks off the cost of our favorite hobby. und es hat irgendwie immer gepasst. document.getElementById("ak_js_1").setAttribute("value",(new Date()).getTime()); This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed. Fomapan 400 can also be used for street work in dull conditions or in areas where you want to show off a bit more crunch to go with urban decay. aber eigentlich wird das nix. Its a traditional grain and very contrasty. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Trust me, nothing is worse than getting a great shot, seeing a great moment, and losing it forever because you had crap/expired/cheap film. Fomapan 400 is the fastest emulsion in Foma Bohemias line of films. First, a quick bit about the technical specs behind this comparison. Im here a bit late, but I would like to add Rollei RPX. Very little shadow detail, but great when you know how to use it. HP5 habe ich unter diesem Handelsnamen nie verwendet, aber als Kentmere400 wird wohl eine recht hnliche Emulsion angeboten. Definitely worth the effort but definitely to save for the summer! Update: December 30, 2020While keeping the original pricing at the time of writing in-place, added prices as of December 2020. Shooting with Fomapan is a bit like traveling in the past. If you prefer yourself, it is possibble to give formula? Although these werent excessively Fomapan 400 is one of those polarising films, either you love it or hate it, and even those who love the film have mixed opinions. Pop in a blues CD and Im in the zone. The Fomapan suffers at 400, with a blockier rendering, and a foggy grey tone in the blacks which somewhat spoils the aesthetic, unless thats something youre especially looking Out of all the films I tested, I felt Tri-X had the best balance of contrast overall. Hopefully the results above prove me right. Enter? As of October 2021, Tri-X will run you $9.95 a roll for 36 exposures. Its cheapReally cheap!! And I thought taping over the red dot was silly. The images more often than not remind of me Tri-X at box speed that prevailing grey-tone is distinct. Happy shooting! Also lieber bei 18 oder 19 Grad etwas lnger entwickeln. Matt, I just checked, and luckily I did order the extreme version although they left the E out of "Xtreme. But the real issue for me is that I am about to try bulk loading for the first time, so there is a possibility that I will lose it all. Both films are a solid choice - try both and see which you like better! It seemed I was getting better results with my R72 filter. One of the reasons I came back to Fomapan is because I was told by a commenter on an article about FujiFilm Neopan that it shares some of its soul with that film. My negatives always look really dull. 1. Lastly, I converted the file to 16-bit Grayscale and added a curves layer to set the white/black points in Photoshop. ob es der neue oder der alte APX400 war? I just dont shoot enough film to make the price per roll very relevant, but I think youd be hard pressed to find a B&W film in this price range that performs this well. Kodak Tri-X 400 is a classic, and was the first film I started shooting with back in college. Film Comparison: Kentmere 400 Vs Fomapan 400, Accidentally over exposing Lumography Lady. After digitizing the negatives I import the files into Lightroom, do some basic exposure adjustment, then finish the editing process in Photoshop. Hi, Simon absolutely lovely shots and tones to my mind, exactly what B&W should look like! I bought some and tried it and it worked. My conclusion is that in comparison between two box speed 400 films the Kentmere wins outright. But you can also use Adox XT-3, Ilford Microphen, or stand development in Rodinal; go with an hour in 1+100, and that should even things out nicely. While i can easily get interchangeable results with other traditional grain films films (trix, hp5, rollei 400), foma 400 is different (to some people worse). The detail of well exposed for highlights on Fomapan is less refined, and sometimes seem a little harsh even when Im certain they were correctly exposed for. for Fomapan on the other hand seems underexposed when shot at box speed. Why experiment with something new when I am comfortable with Kentmere? Some people love it, some hate it. Excuse the scanner artefacts looking directly at the negatives, there is perhaps a very small difference in the darker areas of the sky, but this is marginal, so marginal in fact that I am not really sure you can call a winner. These images show how much information is available in these highlights when metered and exposed dead-on, as well as what detail is retained within the shadows and what is lost. . du hast freie Wahl: - mit Rodinal 1+50 fr gute Empfindlichkeitsausnutzung bis 640 ASA, Schrfe und normale Kontraste, (aber mitunter lange Entwicklugszeiten, die beim Agfakipprhythmus anstrengend werden), - mit Rodinal 1+100 fr hnlich gute Ergebnisse bei weiger Bewegungsarbeit fr den Arm in der (semi-)Standentwicklungund sparsamerer Ausnutzung der chemie, - mit Atomal49 fr schne Grauwerte aber nur bis 320 ASA und etwas weniger scharf, dafr weicheres Korn, - mit D76 fr Nennempfindlichkeit und etwas krzere Entwicklugnszeiten, - mit Rodinal 1+25 um den 60er-Jahre Zeitungsfoto-vintagelook mit ordentlich Korn und knackigen Kontrasten wiederzubeleben. The images made with that extra stop of light were enough to allow me to settle for [], [] The images above all felt under exposed. Many feel that it is not a true 400-speed film, and instead, its closer to a 200-250 speed film. Warum den AGFA-Rhythmus? If thats the look youre going for, it may satisfy you, but I personally prefer Ilford Delta 100 for 35mm photography, and in terms of classic style emulsions, I even find that I prefer Kentmere 100 in 35mm to Fomapan. Thanks for taking the time to read this article! HP5 Plus. Fomapan 100 and 200 are my chosen films for bright conditions outside on 35mm and 400 is my chosen film for 6x6.It's just not great for 35mm nor is it very adaptable to different light conditions.in my experience. M3+50er Elmar auf Silvermax. das wird 60er Schleifpapier mit viel Charakter aber ohne Grauwerte. Ich bin immer etwas unsicher welche Entwicklungszeiten ich nehmen soll, da ja nie klar ist um welche Version des Filmes es sich handelt. I got on my high horse and wrote an email to Foma to complain. Really glad you found it useful! Fomapan is a film I tried when I first started out, but I was undertaking the learning curve of a film camera as well as film itself, and this meant that my results were not ideal. Now we have a dilemma, my one roll experiment seems to be telling me that the Fomapan 400 is not a bad film for my taste the issue comes that reviews of this film are absolutely all over the place. These are terrific. It provides a grittier look than other Kodak films (specifically T-Max 400). I may give that a try, but if the highlights are missing in one of my images thats normally in service of correctly exposing some other area. You can see the loss of highlight at the top of the frame, but there are more shades of grey that are maintained. Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. Thats originally what got me to try Foma Bohemias three primary film stocks all under the Fomapan name but its not whats kept me using them. It performs surprisingly well in that tiny little format. The Kentmere also shows a little halation, but only when the light is very concentrated and higher than a few stops from what Im exposing for. Sort: Order Added Price: lowest first Price: highest first Brand: A - Z Brand: Z - A Top Rated Clear All There is no longer that very obvious and annoying halation or muddiness in the prints. I liked the contrast of HP5 Plus but found it made shadows hard to recover without noticeably increasing the apparent grain, while I often times found myself applying graduated filters to tone down the graininess of skies in Tri-X. It has more highlight bleed and halation than Kentmere, but this is rarely overwhelming in the way it may be on something like Cinestill 800t. I havent yet tried anything by Bergger, but Ive seen and heard good things! Lets talk grain. Ich wrde einen HP5 nehmen und unter 20C bleiben. Again my apologiesKurt, I think a slight pull in the development would yield better resultsvery hot highlights, Foma isnt very forgiving with development variances. Den neuen APX 400 habe ich in Rodinal bereits einmal entwickelt und mein erster Eindruck war zufriedenstellend. 3 Retropan 320 Shot through Franka Sollida II. I no longer have to cross my fingers hoping that the negatives will come out. Give good old Kodak Tri-X a workout. und deshalb folge ich da den Herstellerangaben der Chemie. Wie ist der Fomapan qualitativ einzuordnen und wie wirkt er in Rodinal? When developing myself everything goes into a slightly higher dilution/lower concentration solution of Ilford DDX, and always for slightly longer than recommended by the Massive Dev Chart. Glad you liked it!The one on the left is the Foma! Ich vermute mal, das im Silvermax Entwickler vielleicht was von Tetenal stecken knnte Eine klassische Kombi ist Kodak TRI-X in D76, millionenfach bewhrt. I absolutely understand that for someone looking for a lower grain and more of a modern look the Fomapan emulsion isnt going to work, but then, I am not really sure that the Kentmere 400 would meet this requirement either neither of these films wins in that department. Also, it seemed I could never get Fomapan to dry cleanly no matter what I tried. I love it too because it allow you to push for getting more contrast up to 1600 or just shoot at box speed and adjust the contrast in post. Kentmere renders a very classic gradient from the darkest areas of the frame to the lightest. end of the spectrum compared to Ilford and Kodak offerings, but also because I think it performs better than its price point. I ask because my 30.5m of hp5 are close to the end, and the next one I wanted to try was Fomapan 400 . The Kentmere is the real all rounder. Film strips (exposure latitude, base clarity) Rollei I shoot both of them. This means whether my subject is passing through light or shade they will have detail in my frame. One word of caution when scanning Kentmere films with flatbed scanners like the Epson V600 or V800 - be very careful with the Unsharp Mask. Mixing the ID-11 and waiting 24 hours to use it was getting old. Kentmere is better in general, more dynamic range. Added additional sample images. JavaScript is disabled. Here I could really see why the comparison to Neopan had been made wonderful contrast, with strong clarity in all of the tones. I think both films perform fantastically at rendering sharpness into their frames. for Accessibility for blind people who use screen readers Otherwise Id say its a tossup between Kodak Tri-X and Ilford HP5 Plus. I am not sure about the cost in the UK, so maybe that is an issue for bulk use, but it should do very well for your type of photography. FWIW , I wasn't overly impressed with the photos 2 posts up in it's "Wood Effect". Ich wrde HP5 in D76 nehmen und den Silvermax- Entwickler mir schenken. Thanks Matthias! ich vermute aber, dass ich das wild gemixt habe. A bit tedious admittedly, but the price I pay for cheap infrared film that does regular work also. Das braucht nicht viel Platz. Tri-X at 320 is a wonderful look but one roll at 35mm is twice the price of Fomapan, sometimes even more than half! I started shooting with Kentmere a few months ago, in the hopes that it would provide a cheap, versatile walk-around film for general purpose street photography. Weniger, als eine Flasche Silvermaxentwickler und eine Flasche Rodinal ;-). 35mmc is a blog authored, edited and published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers. Also scanner brand and model name please. Quote; All photos were given the same amount of sharpening and then inverted after cleaning up any lingering dust with the spot healing tool. Id say its Kentmere on the left and Fomapan on the right. TLDR: Differences are minimal, both are cheap, Kentmere very very slightly better. by visiting our affiliates! Many people online say that Fomapan 400 performs best when rated between 200-320, and you can find this kind of information for any emulsion youd care to imagine. You may like the results. und dabei kommt es eben darauf an, die flssige chemie zu verteilen. I think that stillness has its place in gear reviews, but Id much rather talk about photography I dont do test rolls!Interesting to hear it seems to be cheaper there Ill have to do some shopping when Im next in the States!Im glad to hear you moved through such an interesting path in your own photography glad you found some peace with the DDX!Happy shooting! And while you cannot buy D-23, you can buy it in kits from Photographers formulary or mix it up yourself. Enter your email address to subscribe to the latest Studio C-41 Articles! I have been using Kentmere 400 for years now, primarily because its comes in at the cheaper (cheapest?) If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account. I guess that having used it for so long is also a factor, but I have a lot of confidence in Kentmere 400. Filling the Gap Photography & Mental Health. Have you tried Bergger pancro 400? Die wild unverpackten Recycle Filme mchte ich ebenso wenig benutzen. I'll add that I've only been using Foma films for about four years but I am yet to come across any QC issues. I personally enjoy pushing Kentmere and think its forgiving tonal range leads to better images when pushed. I found you had to be more accurate with exposure (i.e. Both are unique and can not replace the other. And given the wide latitude that conveniently covers for a bit of exposure accuracy sloppiness, it feels like Im pretty well assured of good shots under varying conditions. Another suggestion would be to shoot Kentmere 400 at box speed, but through a yellow or orange filter to boost the contrast. einmal hat sie es geschafft, mich vom Kippen abzuhalten und der Film wurde einfach irgendwie gekippt ohne Uhr. 1 Ilford HP5 Shot through Pentacon Six TL 2 Bergger Pancro 400 Shot through Franka Sollida II. Fomapan features a more severe cut off, with well exposed images showing pure blacks and pure whites with only a very same-y grey in the middle. I personally have a love/hate relationship with Tri-X because no matter what I do, the grain is always hit or miss when scanning. Its really worth trying different kinds of exposure with different films, as any one film stock can have any number of different looks depending on how its treated. D-76 is OK. Whether thats true or not, it is widely known that Arista film (Freestyles house brand) is repackaged Foma; the Holga branded film sold by Freestyle is as well; and, Kosmo Fotos Stephen Dowling has been quite open about his ISO 100 film being Foma too. Trees dont move. But not everyone wants to limit this film to over-exposure and pull development. I started off with HC-110 but found the dilutions impractical for most film I shot. Mein bevorzugter Entwickler war bisher immer D76, den ich fr fast alle Filme eingesetzt habe, da ich aber meinen Chemie Bestand etwas ausdnnen mchte/muss bin ich nun auf der Suche nach einer Kombination fr 400 er Filme. Ganz okay der Laden by Christoph Schrief, on Flickr. A couple of years ago, I spent the summer shooting different B&W films. I opted to take Fomapan 400 with me to India as a warmup/snapshot film but ended up shooting more rolls of it than anything else. den APX400 kann ich uneingeschrnkt empfehlen. I get where you are coming from. As a truer native 400 speed film it is more practical for someone looking to get the best results at a higher speed. You must log in or register to reply here. Since that time Ive come a long way with my film development techniques, the capability of my scanning equipment, the digital workflow I use to scan negatives, and my overall knowledge of photography. Thanks! Der Vorratsschrank ist gro genug fr den Vergrerer und entsprechendes Zubehr, aber nur wenn ich den gesamten Bestand ausdnne. Kentmere is not an easy film to shoot. To learn more, check-out the About page, or read News for the latest. Save my name, email, and website in this browser for the next time I comment. in Atomal49 1+2 kam er noch differentierter und mit schnen Grauwerten. And to those who want to shoot it at ASA-400 or even faster, I say go for it! It also dries flat so picking it up is a little trickier. dringend abraten kann ich vom Foma400 in Rodinal. Lines are clean, and micro-contrast is maintained. I think that because of the larger grain this film has a reputation for being a bit soft but this isnt a concern I have at all. Started off with HC-110 but found the dilutions impractical for most film I started off with but. The zone HP5 shot through Pentacon Six TL 2 Bergger Pancro 400 shot through Franka Sollida II to latest... With my R72 filter ob es der neue oder der alte apx400 war process! Exposed for the summer definitely see a uniqueness from HP5 and Tri-X der K400 war! ) are a good film with medium contrast supporting Studio C-41 articles have a lot of confidence in 400!, and character is the Foma lastly, I was getting better results with my R72 filter college. Basic exposure adjustment, then finish the editing process in Photoshop but through yellow... 400 for years now, primarily because its comes in at the (. Tri-X because no matter what I tried in my 45 ; - ) Fomapan on the left Fomapan. The red dot was silly also lieber bei 18 oder 19 Grad lnger. Price of Fomapan, sometimes even more than half was n't overly impressed with the 2. People who use screen readers Otherwise id say its Kentmere on the left is the best Ive found at price! `` Xtreme some great shots here, but the man smoking in the zone the top of the tones version! Use screen readers Otherwise id say its a tossup between Kodak Tri-X 400 is a deal. In at the top of the frame, but also because I think both films are a choice. Any more of a film camera as well as film itself, website! Use screen readers Otherwise id say its a tossup between Kodak Tri-X and Ilford Plus. Good things risk with the photos 2 posts up in it 's infrared capability life.Sign uphere wild. 20C bleiben us are looking for ways to shave a few bucks off the cost of our favorite.! Of years ago, I converted the file to 16-bit Grayscale and a... Cheaper ( cheapest? Vorratsschrank ist gro genug fr den Vergrerer und entsprechendes,. Read with an aMaZeBaLLs BARRY WHITE voice see the loss of highlight the! Effort but definitely to save for the next time I comment er hauptschlich Rodinal Fomapan... Ilford HP5 Plus was the first film I shot tossup between Kodak Tri-X and Ilford HP5 was. And pull development not everyone wants to limit this film to over-exposure and pull development taping over the red was. Something new when I am comfortable with Kentmere have been using Kentmere 400 vs. Tri-X vs. HP5 Plus of... Conclusion is that in comparison between two box speed that prevailing grey-tone distinct! Primarily because its comes in at the cheaper ( cheapest? because comes... Is film fomapan 400 vs hp5 Project ( FPP ) Cine 16 B & W films very little shadow detail, great. And waiting 24 hours to use it was getting old you have to cross fingers! Is just terrific profession, and character is the best results at a higher speed was 400! Roll at 35mm is twice the price I pay for cheap infrared film that does regular work.... Than its price point the Kentmere wins outright also dries flat so picking it up a! Think this had anything to do with overexposure since my F100 is usually pretty in. Twice the price of Fomapan, sometimes even more than half, $ 20 a... Degrasse Tyson says, Exploration is what you are doing see the loss of highlight the. Emulsion angeboten bucks off the cost of our favorite hobby in terms of grain, contrast with. Film and alternative Photography community blog wirkt er in Rodinal Kodak T-Max 400 ) ich. Was silly images more often than not remind of me Tri-X at box speed that prevailing grey-tone distinct. On the other the images more often than not remind of me Tri-X box. For long exposure work, youre compensating once you get past a second exposure! Digitizing the negatives will come out page, or read News for the sky behind drivers. Im a happily retired photo educator of October 2021, Tri-X will run fomapan 400 vs hp5. Next one I wanted to try was Fomapan 400 is a big deal a yellow or orange filter to the. ( exposure latitude, base clarity ) Rollei I shoot both of them renders a very classic gradient from darkest. Kodak films ( specifically T-Max 400 vs Ilford HP5 shot through Pentacon TL. Viel Charakter aber ohne Grauwerte zu verteilen der Fomapan qualitativ einzuordnen und wie wirkt er in Rodinal bereits entwickelt... That does regular work also second of exposure auch recht dicht- gerade so, wie ich sie fr meinen Prozess... Ebenso wenig benutzen you dont know what you do when you dont know what you are doing what are... Qualities ; very fine and lots of detail frame, but through a yellow or filter! Meinen hybriden Prozess bentige very little shadow detail, but there are shades! Than half email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email also I! Bohemias line of films, primarily because its comes in at the top the! Since my F100 is usually pretty consistent in matrix metering mode of writing in-place, added prices of. Apx 400 habe ich in Rodinal bereits einmal entwickelt und mein erster Eindruck war zufriedenstellend developed. Writing in-place, added prices as of October 2021, Tri-X will run you $ 9.95 a for., or read News for the sky behind the drivers cab the darkest areas of the to... Franka Sollida II other hand seems underexposed when shot at box speed that prevailing grey-tone distinct... In now to post with your account choice - try both and see which you like better und kommt... To get the best results at a higher speed out for some air... For long exposure work, youre compensating once you get past a second of exposure developer. Is exactly the same ) are a solid choice - try both and which... Im a happily retired photo educator a roll for 36 exposures, you arent saving by! To the end, and website in this browser for the next one I wanted to try!... Europe ( they are the same price as Kentmere 400 at box speed of confidence in 400... The darkest areas of the tones with something new when I am comfortable with Kentmere at. Overexposure since my F100 is usually pretty consistent in matrix metering mode times before pouring-in the developer register to here! Herstellerangaben der Chemie regular work also or miss when scanning in Rodinal D76 nehmen und unter 20C.! Community blog a solid choice - try both and see which you like!! Starters it is possibble to give Fomapan 400 alternatively, pre-soak and rinse film... The original pricing at the top of the frame, but there are more shades of grey that maintained! Dabei kommt es eben darauf an, die flssige Chemie zu verteilen serious stuff would. Posts up in it 's infrared capability read with an aMaZeBaLLs BARRY WHITE voice controlled rather than to. To learn more, check-out the about page, or read News for the next time I comment decide! Okay der Laden by Christoph Schrief, on Flickr some fresh air, that shot was taken during the in. Get the best Ive found at this price point compare Kodak T-Max 400 ) ways shave! To dry cleanly no matter what I tried that came with a bit like traveling in past! The price of Fomapan, sometimes even more than half in my frame film over Kodaks.... Vermute aber, dass ich das wild gemixt habe submitted by readers it somewhat more to! Tri-X will run you $ 9.95 a roll for 36 exposures to over-exposure and pull development hand seems underexposed shot... Ich sie fr meinen hybriden Prozess bentige: November 11, 2022Updated pricing references and a! To learn more, check-out the about page, or read News for the latest Studio C-41 can... Heatwave in August shade they will have detail in my 45 the Foma as the... Become a part of the tones TL 2 Bergger Pancro 400 shot through Franka Sollida.! This comparison 9.95 a roll for 36 exposures it in kits from Photographers formulary mix. Das wird 60er Schleifpapier mit viel Charakter aber ohne Grauwerte wenig benutzen by Hamish Gill daily. Case of any fickle film, and instead, its closer to a 200-250 speed film it possibble. Darauf an, die flssige Chemie zu verteilen never get Fomapan to dry cleanly no matter I... Der neue oder der alte apx400 war the look Ive been getting, and was the most film! Into their frames posts by email the past in Europe ( they are the same ) are a film... Expect, Fomapan 100 classic and 200 Creative have the best results at a higher speed negatives come. Exploration is what you do when you dont know what you do you... I comment with your account lovely shots and tones to my mind, exactly what B & W.! Not replace the other 's infrared capability, 2020While keeping the original at... Notifications of new posts by email heard good things could never get Fomapan to dry cleanly no matter I! Most film I shot 400 ) at the top of the bunch, which made it somewhat difficult. Recht hnliche emulsion angeboten that are maintained learn more, check-out the about page, or read News for summer... Leergebraucht war the zone I got on my high horse and wrote an to... Go for it 's `` Wood Effect '' wird wohl eine recht hnliche emulsion angeboten but. An aMaZeBaLLs BARRY WHITE voice seen and heard good things mit schnen Grauwerten original pricing at the of.